James <[email protected]> writes: > I'll make a patch. > > I'm not sure how the process will work (from my own point of view anyway) > as Patchy only tests against master and we've split of 2.18, so I'll do the > make and make check/doc manually if that is OK? > > Assuming it is all OK, and goes through the countdown, do I just 'git push > HEAD:stable/2.18'?
No, stable/2.18 is my turf. You just go through the standard process in relation to master. If you don't want to actually push to master, you can send me a git format-patch version against master (or stable/2.18 if you want to rebase there yourself) and I'll take it from there. If that's too complex, just stay relative to master and push to staging. Once it went through cleanly, I'll cherry-pick from master into stable/2.18 (fixing the merge conflict) and revert in staging afterwards. 2.18-only changes are a bit of a nuisance to deal with, but fortunately there are not all that many of them. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
