David Kastrup wrote: > So it would be extra-velocity. That makes it sound like it's added to velocity instead of multiplied — but actually it should be added, because it gives a more consistent effect across dynamics. Multiplying a quiet note's velocity by 1.2 gives hardly any accent, but adding 20 sounds about the same at \pp and \ff. I'll change it.
Ian Hulin wrote: > Also, if your aim is to implement the articulate.ly audio effects > without having to use articulate.ly work-round method of using a > parallel \score block that's a good aim, too. That's the idea. > the next goal for this sub-project may be to get the audio playback > to honour the \repeat structures by translating the volta and > tremolo flavours to unfold. I want this too, but apparently it was discussed previously, and some users don't want voltas automatically unfolded, because they don't want to hear them twice when proofreading. > Another performer-type issue - very definitely separate from this > patch - is transposed audio output. Best to note the interaction of > the audio output and the \transpose and \transposition commands as a > TODO - the issue is does Lily apply pitch-bends to effect audio > transposition to implement respect a \transposition command and how > does this play nicely when \transpose is used for the printed > output? Audio_note just uses Pitch::transposed; it doesn't do anything special about \transpose. IIUC the only problem with their interaction is that \transpose mistakenly transposes \transposition. [on overlapping notes in slurs] > Are there any negative results for percussive and plucked instruments > when using this approach? For undamped instruments like harp and most drums, no — these instruments generally ignore the note-off event, so it doesn't matter when it comes. For guitar-like instruments, the result is not a significant improvement, because the notes are still replucked instead of just fingered. I don't think MIDI can do pull-offs without either portamento-mode or pitch-bend abuse. > Is co-existence and inter-operation with articulate.ly an overall > goal for this set of patches? Not specifically, but it would be annoying if it broke articulate.ly (by e.g. shortening staccatos twice), since so many people use it. > Or have the hook scale up the durations of the notes you return by a > factor you tune via a property for all fermatae? Doing fermatas by changing the durations would require delaying all later notes. This isn't supported yet, but might not be terribly hard to add. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
