>> Hmm. So why do we have
>>
>> commit 9918cd9f8d8f5461c6ad7e086fd93de59960eb95
>> Author: Phil Holmes <[email protected]>
>> Date: Sun Nov 24 22:05:16 2013 +0000
>>
>> Release: bump VERSION.
>>
>> in the `master' branch? This looks incorrect to me, given that we
>> currently derive 2.17.9X tarballs from the `stable' branch, right?
>
> VERSION is out of step on master and stable, so needs bumping
> separately on each.
But I think we must not use 2.17.9X for the `master' branch! Such
tags should be only used on `stable'. It's totally confusing if a
developer reports a problem with, say, 2.17.97, and we have to ask `on
stable or on master?'...
IMHO, releases from `master' should use 2.19.XX. Then we can add
proper tags also so that e.g. `git describe' returns meaningful
results.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel