On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/12/13 14:25, David Nalesnik wrote: > >> The problem is that the position of the tuplet number is tied to the >> placement >> of the tuplet bracket, whether it is drawn or not. >> > > I would argue that probably here the _real_ problem is that the tuplet > bracket is designed to always place itself "outside" all the notes, whereas > if you look at hand-engraved scores, you'd see that the likely way this > would be handled would be for the number _and_ the bracket to be close to > the beam, and for the bracket to be broken to let the couple of opposing > stems through. > > Well, sure, bracket placement could be improved as well. However, it doesn't make much sense to me that the number should be tied to the position of a bracket which isn't there.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
