David Kastrup wrote > I suggest to let the topic of the _last_ GSoC rest until there are more > tangible results. That concerns the "Janek's GSoC work can legitimately > be presented in a positive light" angle. > > That does neither mean leaving the page as it is currently, nor removing > it completely. It just means that we should not try selling something > as a success until we have more to show for it.
That makes sense to me. No need to either hide it as a "failure" or sell it as a success before the results are in. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Website-questions-GSoC-tp155646p155668.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
