https://codereview.appspot.com/44720043/diff/20001/Documentation/included/authors.itexi File Documentation/included/authors.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/44720043/diff/20001/Documentation/included/authors.itexi#newcode193 Documentation/included/authors.itexi:193: Devon Schudy, On 2013/12/25 12:24:10, dak wrote:
Uh, Devon is not a core developer of 2.18 (and that's where we need
the update):
as far as I can tell his work is starting in 2.19. Now I can
cherrypick this
into 2.18 and do fixes to that list to dial it back to the 2.18 state.
OK. I was only doing authors from 2.17.0 until 'now' (rather than stopping at when you branched dev/2.18).
There is another entry puzzling to me:
https://codereview.appspot.com/44720043/diff/20001/Documentation/included/authors.itexi#newcode196 Documentation/included/authors.itexi:196: Chong Yidong On 2013/12/25 12:24:10, dak wrote:
Chong Yidong is one of the two Emacs maintainers. How has he made it
into our
core developer list?
Hmm.. git log --since=25-08-2012 --pretty=medium | grep Author | grep Chong That's how. --snip-- commit 4d11b166f619770636a764ba629be107b8e0b81b Author: David Kastrup <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 13 10:55:28 2012 +0100 Issue 3018: lilypond-mode.el: Replace use of obsoleted compile-internal In Emacs 24, compile-internal is no longer defined. The respective commit in the Emacs repository (from git mirror) shows: commit 318ea0e29450b3c6e588287719e170e35a978cf7 Author: Chong Yidong <[email protected]> Date: Mon Sep 24 20:23:25 2012 +0800 ... --snip-- Sorry. I often don't know one 'new' Dev from another and we have been getting a lot of checkins from Devs that don't have commit and/or push access. I did put this patch up for review though :") https://codereview.appspot.com/44720043/diff/20001/Documentation/included/authors.itexi#newcode259 Documentation/included/authors.itexi:259: Alex Loomis, On 2013/12/25 12:24:10, dak wrote:
Again, I am of the impression that Alex Loomis would start in 2.19.
Is that
correct?
Well I did a quick scan in the users list and they are not always using a specific version and again technically most users are going to be using 2.17 (or stable 2.16), but I have no feelings either way if you want to remove him from the 2.18 lists.
In general, I'd like to use those lists/macros in order to do the 2.18
release
message, so I need the 2.18 state. Am I correct in assuming that I'll
get that
by removing the three mentioned names?
Looks like it.
Is then there anybody missing?
Apart from any one who thinks I have missed someone from the 'support' list - most of those that support are already here or are in the other core lists as far as I can tell. https://codereview.appspot.com/44720043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
