Marc Hohl <marc <at> hohlart.de> writes: > I am about to upload a patch for these four glyphs within the next > days, but I wanted to ask whether a new (or enhanced existing) > regtest is necessary for this type of enhancement?
They could conceivably be broken accidentally, by a mistaken change to our .mf files or a metafont bug, so a regression test is useful. LilyPond probably has too many tests, but you could add to 'clefs.ly' _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
