I suggest just removing the obsolete text, and skipping the additions (unless you are worried that the manual is getting too short).
https://codereview.appspot.com/61170044/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely File Documentation/notation/repeats.itely (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/61170044/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely#oldcode172 Documentation/notation/repeats.itely:172: @lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=1] While you are looking at this section, you might consider removing the comments in these two examples. The comments "no \partial here" make it very difficult to read. I look at it and keep thinking that we *do* need a \partial somewhere because I see it in several places. If this example didn't exist I would not think I needed \partial to write this. Simple examples confirming that fact would help everyone. https://codereview.appspot.com/61170044/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely File Documentation/notation/repeats.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61170044/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely#newcode215 Documentation/notation/repeats.itely:215: These three examples are more useful as regression tests than as documentation. If someone needs a time-signature change in the first alternative, this is the only way to write it. So the one or two people who will write something like this don't need the docs, and the rest of us will spend time being puzzled before figuring out that the second ending in 3/4 time is how it must work. https://codereview.appspot.com/61170044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
