----- Original Message -----
From: "James" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>; "Pierre Perol-Schneider"
<[email protected]>
Cc: "Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: snippets/new
On 12/04/14 12:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: Devel
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: snippets/new
2014-04-12 13:26 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes [email protected]:
> I'm assuming you've tried this with just "tagline = ##f" and it
doesn't > work?
Yes of course
> The downside of this approach is presumably that you have to work
out > how many lines are in the snippet and adjust the paper size >
appropriately?
Yes indeed.
AFAIK up to now, there is nothing easier.
OK - it seems to me that we should not use this on "docs" tagged
snippets, since a) it might affect how the snippets are compiled into the
documentation, and b) it's code we would not want in all the documented
snippets.
--
Phil Holmes
So is there anything that needs to be done with Doc - patch-wise?
James
I don't think so. Anything that should be done would be done with an LSR
import, and 9 times out of 10 I check and push them without a patch.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
