https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi File Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode950 Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:950: @samp{The@tie{}@@code@{@bs{}foo@}@tie{}command}). However, if a Why write @bs{} instead of \ here? https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode951 Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:951: Texinfo string is within a block of Scheme code, it must be That's incorrect. Correct would be: However, within double-quoted Scheme and/or LilyPond strings, backslashes (including those ending up in Texinfo markup) need to be escaped by doubling them. There is no such thing as a "Texinfo string", and it is not contained in "Scheme code" but rather in strings. https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode955 Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:955: "The @@code@{@bs{}@bs{}foo@} command..." That's awfully unreadable source code. I'd be tempted to use @verbatim instead in order to avoid all the Texinfo escapes. Also there is no point in writing @bs{}@bs{} instead of \\ here. https://codereview.appspot.com/112040043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
