markpolesky wrote > Regarding the naming, looks like it's a tie between `resize' and > `magnify', with `magnify' slightly ahead if you count Paul's vote as > split: > > scale: Paul > resize: Paul, Marc > magnify: James, David N. > > Unless there's more opposition, I'll probably push it as `magnify'; we > can always change it later.
I think David N. makes a good point about the existence of the \magnify and \scale markup commands. Maintaining consistency with them is a good idea. (I assume we wouldn't want to rename a markup command as well.) The \magnify markup command is closer to these functions than \scale, and avoids any potential confusion between musical scales and scaling sizes (especially for non-native english speakers), so these things strengthen the case for magnify. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Issue-4015-Add-magnifyStaff-issue-117830043-by-markpolesky-gmail-com-tp164515p164758.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
