On 2014/08/16 18:55:57, dak wrote:
On 2014/08/16 18:36:50, lemzwerg wrote:
If you like the encapsulation, you like the patch for issue 2507. If
you like
that nested properties will just work without handwaving and ifs and
buts, you
like this issue.
I really like this solution. I spent some time trying to figure out how to get reverts right during my work on beaming; I never found a good algorithm. This makes it nice.
The encapsulation means that it should be reasonably straightforward
to swap out
the internals for something different again at some other point of
time if
that's desirable.
I love the encapsulation. Separating implementation from function is always good. Thanks, Carl https://codereview.appspot.com/131770043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
