David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > Phil Holmes <[email protected]> writes: > >> GUB failed today with the following errors: >> >> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- >> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh: In static member >> function 'static scm_unused_struct* Unpure_pure_container::make_smob >> (scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*)': >> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- >> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh:39: >> error: 'template<class Super> class Smob2' used without template parameters >> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- >> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh:40: >> error: 'template<class Super> class Smob2' used without template parameters >> >> I assume this is http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4082 > > The actually flagged code is in issue 4086 instead, though 4086 heavily > depends on 4082. > >> but it's way over my head to know what the problem is. > > Possibly an older gcc version. Are these the only errors? In a > parallel build, one would expect to run across several errors in > different files before compilation bombs out. Would be good to know > and/or have some further complaints to look at. > > I'll try brooding over the error messages and see whether they suggest > some syntax that might be more palatable to older gcc versions.
Pushed a matching fix. It does not appear that this particular problem is coded elsewhere. I think that the compiler complaint might be correct even though my newer GCC variant does not bother mentioning it. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
