Not using different types for members with the same name is an
improvement.
This works with gcc 4.4.3 in LilyDev.


https://codereview.appspot.com/153970044/diff/1/lily/include/smobs.hh
File lily/include/smobs.hh (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/153970044/diff/1/lily/include/smobs.hh#newcode175
lily/include/smobs.hh:175: // Since we consider those internal-only, two
of them are actually
Update comment?

https://codereview.appspot.com/153970044/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to