I've not followed the corresponding email discussion closely, and maybe I've missed something, but how is this better than simply using \obreak for an original break, and \nbreak for a new, required, break, having defined
obreak = \break nbreak = <> in order to obtain the original breaks. And then simply redefining obreak = <> nbreak = \break to remove the original breaks and activate the new ones? And equivalently for page breaks. This has the advantage that newly inserted breaks don't interfere with the original ones. It would also be trivial to remove all these editing aids finally with a simple global edits. That seems so simple anyone can do it without adding anything to the base code and almost a page to the documentation. Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/150670043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
