Am 04.11.2014 um 15:18 schrieb Hans Aberg:
On 4 Nov 2014, at 10:49, Marc Hohl <[email protected]> wrote:
Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble <[email protected]> writes:
If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the
time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable? For
example,
2 + 3 2 + 3 4
----- + C vs. ----- + -
4 4 4
Undesirable in my book.
I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, ...
It could be interpreted as a compound meter 2+3 followed by one in 4,
indicating that the metric accent on 4 should be stronger than the one on 3.
This is different from 2+3+4, which means that it is unspecified, or possibly
that they are about the same.
Ok, but this is something I would indicate by a ">" on the first beat of
the 4/4 part and "simile" for the rest – or some explanation for the
musician ...
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
