On 11/22/14 9:35 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >Hi together, > >I am currently contemplating our chord support and it appears rather >badly modularized to me. > ><SNIP> > >This is one area where the existing possibilities for customization >(like the chord naming functions in context properties) are of such >limited usefulness that I would consider incompatibility with code using >these hooks an acceptable price to pay for a sane and versatile >redesign.
I totally agree that a sane and versatile redesign of LilyPond's Chords system would be helpful. Code incompatibility would be fine if the resulting system were cleaner, less complicated, and more extensible. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
