dak wrote > Paul Morris < > paul@
> > writes: >> Hmmm... would it be a good idea to also have a ly:grob-has-interface >> scheme >> function? > > How would it differ from the existing grob::has-interface Um... oops, I guess it wouldn't... Never mind, I just didn't know about grob::has-interface. (I usually just look on the internals/scheme-functions manual page for this kind of thing.) Sorry for the noise, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Make-Grob-name-accessible-to-Scheme-issue-203090043-by-david-nalesnik-gmail-com-tp171933p171965.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
