2015-04-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 <lilyli...@googlemail.com>: > Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already. > > However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes > ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second > one only one beam. > > Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth note's > worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is itself > subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should be > propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16 64th > notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the > following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3.
could you formulate this more generally? e.g. what to do with 12 32th notes? p _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
