2015-05-02 23:46 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>:
> I think you should submit this code as a patch to scm/stencil.scm.  Also,
> the regtests should be fixed to show the new behavior.
>
> Using a scale of -1 is the appropriate thing to do when you want to have
> the *origin* stay in the same location.  Using stencil-flip is the
> appropriate thing to do when you want the *bounding box* to stay in the
> same location.
>
> Both behaviors could be desired.

+1

Janek

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to