On 2015/05/10 22:50:36, dak wrote:
The \revert version generated "too many clashing notecolumns"
warnings, which
is now "need a \shiftXxx", and I thought it a bit safer to keep a
warning.
What's safer here? For old code where people did not bother heeding
the warning
anyway (possibly because the output was ok for them)
Well, I think the newer warning is much more helpful, and the updater of the code is more experienced than he was when he first wrote the code. There is also the (remote) possibility that someone wrote a function depending on \shiftOff being a \revert -- maybe using \shiftOff as part of restoring the former state, or something. I can't find an example where convert-ly's replacing \shiftOff, with code to keep the old behavior, is actually helpful. So, I'll just reverse the unwanted changes in the docs. https://codereview.appspot.com/190500043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
