I'm not opposed to the change to explicit \relative; it avoids having to explain why it was omitted in the examples, and makes the example code more exactly correspond to the code obtained by clicking on the image. But I think if are to make this change it would also be good to say what leaving out \relative means. It was difficult to do this before as all the examples left it out (apparently). Now we can do it. Placing a brief explanation at the beginning of 1.2.1 would explain the mysterious 's in those first examples of code.
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/10006/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/10006/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely#newcode2124 Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely:2124: \relative c' { no leading spaces https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
