On 5/30/15 12:51 PM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote: >David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > >At any rate: huh. I propose getting rid of a 10-year old syntactic >artifact and the only response are naming convention enquiries. I mean: >good to know that there are still developers alive. > >I still think it may have the potential of issue 2883 where its general >availability lagged behind people becoming used to it.
This is far enough over my head that I don't feel qualified to comment on it. Based on what I saw, it looks very useful. I love the idea of getting rid of arbitrary variables that the user cannot change (parser and location). I trust you to do the right thing. You've demonstrated that you can and will. So I guess this means LGTM, but I suppose that is not worth much coming from me. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
