Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: >> do we want to take on the commitment to maintain Allura ourselves or >> use the maintained version at SourceForge. Which would we prefer? > > Lilypond is a GNU project, thus I strongly favour Savannah as the > primary site for everything. > >> (FWIW my preference would be to run Allura at Savannah as our >> primary DB, with a backup being maintained at SF, which I would be >> happy to do on a monthly basis.) > > This sounds like a sensible approach.
Given the reports that SourceForge distributes Adware (and there even have been virus-ridden versions of it) on its Windows installers, I'm somewhat wary here. It would be sort of strange to use project facilities there without offering downloads, and I suspect if we do that, SourceForge might decide to put "enhanced" downloads there by themselves. A bit of a pity: they've been a rather important resource and rallying point for free software at one point of time. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
