On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 23:50:50 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/243610043/diff/1/lily/balloon.cc#newcode94 lily/balloon.cc:94: b.widen (padding, padding); Basically we have two options here: not draw a box at all (it would be my guess that this is probably what happened previously when assertions were disabled) or draw a box around the not-with-stencil anchor point.
The former behavior leaked NaNs and corrupted spacing on the whole line. This is for the situation where a user, through misunderstanding or oversight, requested an indicator box be drawn around an object that does not actually appear in print. A tiny empty box says clearly "I heard you ask for a box, but I didn't recognize or find what you wanted me to draw it around." _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
