On 2015/07/11 02:24:58, Dan Eble wrote:
I appreciate your comment about this opening a can of worms, but I do
like the
simplification.
Now I'll open a can of my own: instead of \incomplete, how about \etc?
That's at least not overly likely to be used previously. Other
possibilities may be symbols like ; or so. ... is out since it is in
active use as part of durations. I thought of using \{ ... \} which has
the advantage of delimiting to the left as well, allowing
omit = \with-doc-string "This does xxx" \{ \tweak stencil #f \}
However, this does not seem overly important, one can do
omit = \tweak \stencil #f \etc
omit = \with-doc-string "This does xxx" #omit
Does not look as pretty, but which end user is going to set a doc string
on his functions?
And \{ ... \} seem nice to leave open for used-defined articulations.
https://codereview.appspot.com/249670043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
