On 2015/08/26 11:22:18, dak wrote:
On 2015/08/26 11:17:23, hanwenn wrote: > not LGTM > > I'll follow up on the bug.
Well, if anybody could it would be you, working at Google. But I
guess for now
you'll have to explain on the Rietveld review. Google Code has been
switched to
readonly.
"preparation of .. " : deriving from Grob is not a feature but a risk. In fact, it would even be nice if Item and Spanner could disappear, but that seems to be intractable. I spent a giant amount of energy distangling formatting logic from C++ type hierarchy, so behaviors can be mixed and matched at runtime, and this is taking a step in the opposite direction. https://codereview.appspot.com/260810043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
