On 2015/10/30 22:59:54, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2015/10/30 21:46:55, benko.pal wrote: > > And PostScript (and PDF and METAFONT) _do_ represent angles in
degrees.
> > So it's sort of silly that we cannot get an angle of 180 degrees > > straight into PostScript without change. > > now that convinced me. if we want to output angles in degrees, we > don't want to switch back and forth neither between degrees and > radians, nor between angles and sines. at most one atan (acos) call > somewhere. > > p
Just back home, noticing the discussion here.
Current patch tries to solve (or better: workaround) the problem in
guile.
I have some other pending patches _needing_ exact values from
coord-rotate.
I'd suggest to push it as is (unless some serious defect would be
detected)
after countdown. So that I can go ahead with the follow up stuff.
Opinions?
I hope to get to a "degree rework", but this patch is sort of unrelated even though I hope to eventually make it unneeded. So it might as well go ahead for now. LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/269530043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
