Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: >>> The grace notes in the incipit for the `Rhythms' section are really >>> badly positioned – I would consider this a bug actually... >> >> Maybe we need a different afterGraceFraction value here? > > I think it's not only a problem of a different `afterGraceFraction'...
The main problem appears to be that there really does not appear to be a point to align gracenotes unless they are sharing stems. >> I mean, why isn't this an optional argument anyway? How is this >> aligned in the original? > > Attached is a scan from IMSLP (Schenker edition from UE). Basically, not aligned at all with other staves. > If I activate the commented-out line in `rhythms-headword.ly' > > \override SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t > > and insert some \breaks to mimick the appearance in notation.pdf, I > get the attached result – which is ugly. A bug? IMHO, accidentals > and grace notes must not collide. "strict spacing" often implies collisions. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
