Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: >>> When has this changed? Or maybe there are still situations where an >>> anchor is needed, thus the example has to be improved? >> >> The respective diff from 2.16 to 2.18 in scm/define-grobs.scm reads: >> [...] >> >> However, reverting all that does not appear to make a change (unless >> I am doing something wrong here). So I'm not sure what to attribute >> the change to (the logs for lily/text-engraver.cc or >> lily/script-engraver.cc do not show anything suspicious to me >> either). > > Thanks for testing. > >> How important is it to figure out the responsible change? > > Well, it's not important (at least not for me), but `anchors' was a > central concept in vertical positioning of grobs, and lo and behold, > it is no longer necessary, so we can correct the documentation.
Could have something to do with issue 3330, committed as part of 2.17.19. No idea just _what_, though (but it streamlines and amends the spacing engine considerably, so it would be a likely candidate). Do we have the docs for 2.17.18 and 2.17.19 for comparison? In other words, I'm a bit lazy. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
