James <[email protected]> writes: > On 01/08/16 11:13, David Kastrup wrote: > >> It is quite possible that had this patch been submitted through the >> regular channels, that some Patchy might have balked at it (though I >> don't know which Texinfo versions are currently installed on the various >> Patchy computers). > > Well all those running patchy tests (and merge) would automatically be > on whatever has been checked into the tree right?
Ah right. Of course patchy-staging _did_ get exercised and was ok with pushing to master, so any test-patchy running on the same machine (with the same Texinfo installation) obviously would not have complained either. I tend to forget about the number of safeguards we have in place. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
