On 2016/10/26 15:16:27, lemzwerg wrote:
> Our checks can detect old URW fonts. > Current URW fonts cannot be detect.
Hmm, fontconfig collects information on a font's supported Unicode
blocks while
adding it to the database. If we check that the URW fonts are not
Filippov's,
but still support Cyrillic, we have the new ones, right? Would that
work? Current newest URW fonts (June 2016) have OTF format. http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commit;h=79bcdfb34fbce12b592cce389fa7a19da6b5b018 Other version of URW fonts do not seem to have OTF format. How about this? . configure script finds the following 12 OTF files. . If they are found, `make install` installs them. (Both TeX Gyre and URW fons are installed to /usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf.) . Even if they are not found, configure script does not raise error. (Only TeX Gyre fonts are installed.) C059-BdIta.otf C059-Bold.otf C059-Italic.otf C059-Roman.otf NimbusMonoPS-Bold.otf NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.otf NimbusMonoPS-Italic.otf NimbusMonoPS-Regular.otf NimbusSans-Bold.otf NimbusSans-BoldOblique.otf NimbusSans-Oblique.otf NimbusSans-Regular.otf https://codereview.appspot.com/316800043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
