thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > On 2016/12/03 11:28:24, dak wrote: >> mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > >> > On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: >> >> However, people might get surprised by >> > >> >> #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) >> > >> >> not working. >> > >> > Btw, it turned out the previous unfold-repeats destructively changed > the >> > music-argument, if called directly. > >> That's common for LilyPond functions. > >> -- >> David Kastrup > > Ok. > Should I remove the call for ly:music-deep-copy?
In the function, I think that is only consistent with what we do and expect elsewhere. Of course, that might mean you have to review its callers to make sure they don't get tripped up by that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
