[email protected] writes: > https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi > File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode952 > Documentation/web/community.itexi:952: @subheading Adopt the SMuFL music > font encoding standard > On 2017/01/30 15:08:45, dak wrote: >> Uh, that's not exactly what I would call "fixing embarrassing syntax > errors". >> It is a complete new paragraph. > >> Though it's not clear to me how this diff comes about: this appears to > be >> already in LilyPond proper anyway. > > I'm not sure what you're concretely referring to here. > In the line the link pointed to (comparing base to patch set 3 There > isn't anything in the diff. > > You will see that SMuFL project paragraph as new when you compare Patch > set 2 with patch set 3.
Which is what I did. > This is due to the fact that patch set 2 was uploaded before I could > push #5037. Ok. > https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/ -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
