Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review. Working on css changes for docs, I realized it wasn't
clear to me, from reading the CG, whether the commit prefix should be
'Doc:' or 'Web:' or something else. So this clarifies things.
-Paul
Description:
Doc: CG: Add guideline for use of 'CSS' prefix in commit messages
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/325970043/
Affected files (+5, -0 lines):
M Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
Index: Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
b/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
index
bfebb9a0c8cf0850a58b62d88d1528af5f0b9eaf..74071217f8c5bcc06dd869c75fb509c35680fd75
100644
--- a/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi
@@ -1252,6 +1252,11 @@ website should use @qq{Web:@tie{}} for English, and
@qq{Web-@var{**}:@tie{}} for other languages.
@item
+CSS: Commits that change CSS files should use @qq{Doc:@tie{}CSS:@tie{}},
+@qq{Web:@tie{}CSS:@tie{}}, or @qq{CSS:@tie{}} depending on whether they
+affect the website, the documentation/manuals, or both.
+
+@item
Changes to a single file are often prefixed with the name of the file
involved.
@end itemize
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
