On 2017/07/31 17:55:29, tisimst wrote:
On 2017/07/31 17:48:10, lemzwerg wrote: > It's not Pango but HarfBuzz that processes (i.e., applies) the
OpenType
> features to a run of glyphs.
Ah, I see! Thanks for clarifying that. I didn't realize Harfbuzz was
part of the
picture. Guess I haven't looked deep enough into the code.
I looked into the latest Harfbuzz internals, and it looks like the list of supported OpenType features is manually maintained. Not all the features listed on the Microsoft feature registry are supported, but many are. The full list can be found here: https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/blob/9813be3d1212eef5a525d64978e0bb2032cd44d9/src/hb-coretext.cc#L439 This list covers pretty much all likely candidates a user is going to encounter or want to use in modern fonts, so it probably isn't worth listing each of the supported features. https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
