James <p...@gnu.org> writes: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:25:38 +0200 > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Ok, I've started sorting out stable and master branch and pushed some >> 2.21-change on top of some already 2.21-only changes in master. > > As I cannot remember what we did in the last fork to stable, I assume I > just keep testing on current master and pushing to 'staging' as normal. > > I also assume that I don't need to do anything special with regard to > 'Patchy' (that just merges staging and master)?
For now that's all, yes. I don't think we had a staging/master mechanism in place for stable. >> The next changes I'd want to push require convert-ly rules. Those >> rules have to be for 2.21.0 to avoid clashing with any work/fixes we >> may still be making on the stable branch. This means that we should >> stop releasing from master until 2.20.0 has been released from the >> stable/2.20 branch. The stable/2.20 branch is currently wired for >> making the next release as 2.19.80. I don't know how many 2.19 >> releases we will actually need. I hope not more than a few until we >> are reasonably sure 2.20 can be released without major backlash. If we can agree on stopping unstable releases right now (it just makes version management less of a headache), I'll push outstanding matter to the unstable branch. >> What should be done in stable/2.20? >> >> Documentation/changes.tely should be reorganized: it is currently in >> chronological order which does not make sense for the stable release. >> It should be organized topically. > > I'll start a tracker and try to start work on that tonight. That would be great. Maybe the version in the stable/2.16 branch can be a bit of a guide. >> We want some assurance that recent changes did not come with big >> followup problems. And we want the translation teams to have a >> chance of catching up to the current state. >> > > Anything else, as Patch Meister, that I should care about? Can't think of anything right now. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel