Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes: > Am 22. Dezember 2017 15:42:39 MEZ schrieb David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >>Dan Eble <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Dec 21, 2017, at 23:06, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> @@ -110,8 +110,7 @@ LY_DEFINE (ly_interpret_music_expression, >>"ly:interpret-music-expression", >>>> >>>> if (!iter->ok ()) >>>> { >>>> - warning (_ ("no music found in score")); >>>> - /* todo: should throw exception. */ >>>> + error (_ ("no music found in score")); >>>> return SCM_BOOL_F; >>>> } >>> >>> Looking at this in isolation, I wonder whether “no music found” is >>the >>> only reason that iter might not be OK; in other words, was the >>message >>> appropriate before you arrived? >> >>\new Voice { } >> >>_is_ arguably music. The other error message before is actually just >>nonsensical since LY_ASSERT_SMOB already catches the respective >>condition. I think we should just let this one complete properly (and >>thus also get an image/PDF) though with a warning. >> >>I actually thought I did change this at one time. At any rate, a >>_fatal_ error at least seems silly. There is no reason not to continue >>here. > > Yes, there may be valid reasons to compile files with no music in them.
This actually doesn't trigger for files with no music in them but for music with no (iterable) music in it. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
