I see arguments both for and against such warnings. • maybe CON, depending on the implementation: It should be possible to set the first mark in a score to something different than 1 without a warning. • CON: a user should be aware that they are responsible for correct numbering (whatever that means) if they’re not using \mark \default because the only reason I can imagine not to use \default is when one wants to have something like out-of-sequence or multiple identical marks → warnings would disturb. • PRO: multiple identical (number/formatted number, not markup) marks seem silly to me.
https://codereview.appspot.com/334510043/diff/1/input/regression/rehearsal-mark-formatters.ly File input/regression/rehearsal-mark-formatters.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/334510043/diff/1/input/regression/rehearsal-mark-formatters.ly#newcode7 input/regression/rehearsal-mark-formatters.ly:7: The marks should read H, K, I, K, 93, XCIV, 9, AB, CC, Dd, xcvi, That 9 comes from \mark 111 with #format-mark-barnumbers and should be changed to 7 because you deleted the first two measures. https://codereview.appspot.com/334510043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
