On Mar 3, 2018, at 13:24, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now that I had I look, let me ask why you propose the simplified snippet. > I can't see anything wrong with the current, doc-tagged, lsr-snippet, > though. If a user wants it this way, why not demonstrating it?
The snippet has \mark 1 at measures 2 and 10, as well as other duplicates. I propose that it does not make sense for a specific rehearsal mark to exist at more than one point in a score, that repeating a mark in a real score is most likely a mistake, and that it would be appropriate for a future version of LilyPond to issue a warning or error about it by default. In that regard, the current snippet sets a bad example. I also propose that the current snippet exceeds the scope of its description. There is no need to repeat rehearsal marks to demonstrate starting them from a given number. This doesn’t mean that I think it should be impossible to mix letter and number marks within a score. If it is valuable, I’m willing to submit a separate snippet to demonstrate whatever you think would be lost by reducing the scope of this one (other than repeating marks). Regards, — Dan _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
