I don't see the point in starting a formal review after this has
already been
discussed on the mailing list.
I was hoping, apparently in vain, that the formal process would lead to a more reasonable discussion. Apparently, however, this process also invites speculation about the amount of work someone is willing to invest, his qualifications and his honesty.
In particular since this differs from your originally proposed patch (where you did not switch to lyrics mode at
all) and
you disengenuously continued the discussion based on a modified patch
(the one
proposed here) which you then tacked onto your results without further
mention. For the record: All the test results were obtained with a) an unpatched lilypond and b) a lilypond with my originally proposed patch. This is easy to verify, and everybody is invited to do so. David: You did not do that, apparently. @Everyone: I won't bother you here any longer. https://codereview.appspot.com/343820043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
