Lukas-Fabian Moser <[email protected]> writes: > This is exactly what I implemented (tried to implement). > > >> A pair-list like '((1 . 2)(3 . 4)) would extent the whiteout-amount in >> x-axis with the values of the first pair, in y-axis with the values of >> the second pair. >> > > Good idea! But wouldn't it be cleaner to use a pair of pairs instead of a > list of pairs?
The print syntax of ((1 . 2) . (3 . 4)) is ((1 . 2) 3 . 4) Pairs of pairs tend to lead to awful print forms. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
