Hello all,
Working on a complete set of note names for all languages (including quarter
tones the new triple flat/sharp accidentals), I've stumbled over an
erroneous German note name definition of "beh".
In German (and most Scandinavian languages), B is called h, and there is the
exception of using "b" for B flat.
All the other alterations of h should not use the letter b:
h, heh, b (!), heseh, heses, heseseh, heseses.
In colloquial German, sometimes "bes" is used for "heses" (Bbb), because the
b (Bb) is being lowered by another half-tone, thus yielding a double-flat.
Following this logic, however, "beh" should lower a b (Bb) by another
quarter-tone step, but the
*current definition of beh is SEMI-FLAT instead of THREE-Q-FLAT!*
I'm somehow reluctant to change definitions that have been around for a long
time, but "beh" is utterly wrong.
*Correct note-names* (the ones marked "new" will introduced as a by-product
of triple-flat/sharp issue #3356)
Question:
Should we keep the current definition of beh, even if it's wrong?
Should we change the current definition of beh to mean THREE-Q-FLAT?
Should we just dump it?
Not at all shure what to do here...
Thanks for any input,
Torsten
PS: the German chord name function produces a sloppy "bes" when it really
should be a "heses":
\chords { \germanChords es1:dim/beses }
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dev-f88644.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
