>> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
>> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
>> function declaration does not take the template parameter list
>> into account:
>> http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1
>
> Huh? This link states:
>
> When a using-declarator brings declarations from a base class
> into a derived class, member functions and member function
> templates in the derived class override and/or hide member
> functions and member function templates with the same name,
> parameter-type-list, cv-qualification, and ref-qualifier (if
> any) in a base class (rather than conflicting).
>
> The parameter-type-list is a different one in this example since
> they contain a different member function pointer type. Which is the
> reason we need the whole hooplahoop in the first place.
And another response:
Isn’t it template-parameter-list that is different rather than
parameter-type-list?
http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#def:parameter-type-list
http://eel.is/c++draft/temp#nt:template-parameter-list
[I must admit that I'm completely lost with those finicky C++
details.]
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
