Hi Knut,
Am 29.01.19 um 10:02 schrieb Knut Petersen:
Hi Urs!
So what can I do to check whether make lilypond succeeded or failed?
The last lines of the terminal output will look like:
make -f lilypond.make update-versions
To upload, run:
make lilypond-upload LILYPOND_BRANCH=master
LILYPOND_REPO_URL=git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
**** nsis rule
python bin/gub tools::nsis
calculating dependencies
Checking for iconv ... /usr/bin/iconv
Checking for g++ ... /usr/bin/g++
Checking for gcc ... /usr/bin/gcc
must rebuild[tools]: system::gcc system::g++ system::iconv
*** Stage: pkg_install (cross/gcc-core, linux-x86)
cross/gcc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
non-core cross/gcc already installed
skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
cross/gcc-doc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
non-core cross/gcc already installed
skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
cross/gcc-runtime conflicts with cross/gcc-core
non-core cross/gcc already installed
skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
*** Stage: pkg_install (glibc-core, linux-x86)
glibc conflicts with glibc-core
non-core glibc already installed
skipping request to install glibc-core
glibc-doc conflicts with glibc-core
non-core glibc already installed
skipping request to install glibc-core
done
**** rest rule
**** all rule
**** Default rule
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/knut/sources/gub'
if everything worked fine.
Indeed that's exactly how it looks like :-)
In uploads you see the generated installers, the documentation, test
results etc:
drwxr-xr-x 2 knut users 4096 29. Jan 08:56 signatures
drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users 4096 29. Jan 08:56 localdoc
drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users 4096 29. Jan 08:56 webdoc
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 137828875 29. Jan 08:56
lilypond-2.21.0-1.webdoc.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 158089031 29. Jan 08:55
lilypond-2.21.0-1.documentation.tar.bz2
drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users 4096 29. Jan 08:34 webtest
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 18416327 29. Jan 08:31
lilypond-2.21.0-1.test-output.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 17226394 29. Jan 08:28 lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users 31251820 29. Jan 08:27
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users 28063129 29. Jan 08:27
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users 30586997 29. Jan 08:27
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users 31375293 29. Jan 08:27
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 34665510 29. Jan 08:26
lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 26746205 29. Jan 08:25
lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 26611149 29. Jan 08:25
lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users 31208955 29. Jan 08:24
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
If you reached that point everything went fine.
At least we hope that everything went fine.
When we will start to update relevant components like guile we will
need a way to test if the generated archives contain a working
lilypond or garbage. I see that you already thought about that by
providing the generated files on your cloud. Thanks you.
Right now I have the process running on my dedicated server running
Debian 9.7 (so far running without errors, but I'll reattach to the
session in the afternoon). If that works too I'd "donate" that server
capacity for further and maybe automated tests, as long as I don't have
to be involved in complicated set-ups or configuration. If necessary I
could then also give someone (e.g. you) a non-privileged user account.
But I'll report back when I have results from the current build.
Urs
Knut
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
