Frankly, my approach would be to throw that function out. It just obfuscates what will and what will not work and keeps GCC from issuing warnings when number and uses of %s don't match.
Hmm. Having a C++ version of `_f' is actually quite nice, since appending `c_str' again and again is a nuisance IMHO. Could you come up with a better replacement? If this is not possible please go ahead and clean up the code. https://codereview.appspot.com/347070043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
