> On 24 Feb 2019, at 21:39, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: > >>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 20:47, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> Are there any other considerations here related to software usage >>>>> rights? GPL v2 versus v3 was mentioned earlier; can anyone provide >>>>> an overview of what that change means for a LilyPond 64 bit macOS >>>>> effort? >>>> >>>> Nothing, I would think. >>> >>> If libraries with incompatible license would require to be linked, it >>> means "nothing" in the sense of "there is nothing we can offer for >>> MacOSX". >> >> I do not think it is any more incompatible than pre 64 bit. > > We had this discussion already. Just because the change to GPLv3 was > not likely checked to be license compatible with a no longer > identifiable version of Xcode does not mean that we can blindly go ahead > without checking when we can.
Xcode license: https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/xcode.pdf _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
