> On 14 Mar 2019, at 19:32, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: > >>> On 14 Mar 2019, at 18:25, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> The passage in question reads >>> >>> 6. Conveying Non-Source Forms. >>> >>> You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms >>> of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the >>> machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, >>> in one of these ways: >> >> So possibly you have an objection distributing the PDF without its >> source code under those forms together with the source code of the >> program!? > > Sigh. This discussion stated that they aren't distributing the > documentation. Of course distributing the PDF without corresponding > source code would not be appropriate,
Please explain. > ...but so far I haven't read anything > that doesn't instead suggest that they are distributing the source code > of the PDF without distributing the PDF because they have not met the > dependencies for building the PDF. That could possibly be done too. > Which is the complete opposite. But including the PDF would be more appropriate. >>>>>> MacPorts admits distinguishing between dependencies for build and >>>>>> the binary installer, so the latter can have just the docs without >>>>>> the stuff required to build it. >>>>> >>>>> Unless I am mistaken we are talking about the documentation being >>>>> completely absent. Which is legitimate but unfortunate. >>>> >>>> There are various possibilities. >>> >>> Usually an applicable truism even if I have no clue what you are >>> referring to here. >> >> MacPorts admits making an independent binary installer from the >> distribution and one can choose what dependencies should be included, >> and also its install location. > > Which has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with the topic of > including the documentation. Or access to the source code. Why do you think so? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel