Karlin High <[email protected]> writes: > On 8/13/2019 4:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> "Frank Bryce" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Unfortunately Im not a programmer so I dont know how to >>> help. >> >> I am not enthused about our current delays > > David K. or other contributors, what would you suggest is a good > LilyPond development area for beginners to work on? > > The documentation seems often suggested, but in my experience it > mostly looks good already (the English version, anyway)
The main translations in good order tend to be the Romance languages. The Germanic ones are really trailing, and the slavic ones are basically in disorder. > and I still have the same question: what needs work? > > The Contributor Guide suggests searching the issue tracker for issues > labeled "frog," but the most recent one is from 2014. Would this still > be a good approach? The problem is that code base problems are not really beginner stuff to tackle. There is a lot these days at LSR level that one can get working on, but there is not a lot of infrastructure (like LaTeX has for plugging in style files) where loose work like this can be collected in an organised manner. One might want to look at the openlilylib stuff. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
