Dear Team, It seems to me like we are pretty much in shape such that we should release 2.20. I'd be fine if we called 2.19.83-1 the 2.20 release, even if there are some critical regressions. 2.19.83 is SO much better than 2.18.2.
IIUC, the only thing 2.20 is waiting on is for David K. to cherry-pick some patches. Is that correct? I'd really like to see us get something out as 2.20 by the first of the year. What can I do to help? Thanks, Carl
